A10-9620P vs Atom x7213RE
A10-9620P
Atom x7213RE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9620P is positioned at rank 537 and the Atom x7213RE is on rank 401, so the Atom x7213RE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-9620P
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7213RE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-9620P | Atom x7213RE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | ✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-9620P | Atom x7213RE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-9620P and Atom x7213RE
A10-9620P
The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.
Atom x7213RE
The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7213RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-9620P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x7213RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Atom x7213RE's 2,538 — a 1% lead for the Atom x7213RE.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Atom x7213RE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 28 nm | 10 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,514 | 2,538 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 485 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7213RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7213RE — the Atom x7213RE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9620P supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A10-9620P) vs 1 (Atom x7213RE). PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 9 (Atom x7213RE) — the Atom x7213RE offers 1 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Atom x7213RE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 9+13% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9620P) / not specified (Atom x7213RE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A10-9620P) and Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7213RE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Atom x7213RE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-9620P and Atom x7213RE
