A10-9620P vs Celeron M P4500

AMD

A10-9620P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron M P4500

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

A10-9620P vs Celeron M P4500 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9620P vs Celeron M P4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9620P vs Celeron M P4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9620P

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5, while Celeron M P4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,514 vs 2,533).

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9620P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
  • No integrated graphics, while A10-9620P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9620P better than Celeron M P4500?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-9620P is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M P4500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A10-9620P still makes the most sense overall. A10-9620P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-9620P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9620P vs Celeron M P4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10-9620P

The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M P4500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-9620P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 — a 58.6% clock advantage for the A10-9620P. The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron M P4500 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Celeron M P4500's 2,533 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron M P4500.

FeatureA10-9620PCeleron M P4500
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+83%
1.86 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,514
2,533
Geekbench 6 Single
485
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M P4500 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-9620PCeleron M P4500
Socket
FP4
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-9620P) / not specified (Celeron M P4500). The A10-9620P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Celeron M P4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U.

FeatureA10-9620PCeleron M P4500
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop