A10-9620P vs Core i3-4100M

A10-9620P vs Core i3-4100M Performance Spectrum

A10-9620P

4 / 4

2,514

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4100M

2 / 4

2,531

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9620P vs Core i3-4100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9620P vs Core i3-4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9620P

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,514 vs 2,531).

Core i3-4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9620P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while A10-9620P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9620P better than Core i3-4100M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-9620P is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4100M pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4100M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-9620P is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-9620P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4100M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9620P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-9620P vs Core i3-4100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9620P

The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-4100M

The Core i3-4100M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,531 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4100M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9620P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-4100M — a 30.5% clock advantage for the A10-9620P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4100M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Core i3-4100M's 2,531 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-4100M.

Feature	A10-9620P	Core i3-4100M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+36%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,514	2,531
Geekbench 6 Single	485	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4100M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100M — the A10-9620P supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9620P supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 16 (Core i3-4100M) — the Core i3-4100M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-9620P	Core i3-4100M
Socket	FP4	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9620P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4100M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 (A10-9620P) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4100M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop, Core i3-4100M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U.