A10-9620P vs Core 2 Duo P8400
A10-9620P
Core 2 Duo P8400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9620P is positioned at rank 537 and the Core 2 Duo P8400 is on rank 33, so the Core 2 Duo P8400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-9620P
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-9620P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-9620P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P8400
A10-9620P
The A10-9620P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,514 points. Launch price was $130.
Core 2 Duo P8400
The Core 2 Duo P8400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,497 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The A10-9620P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-9620P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-9620P versus 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8400 — a 40.3% clock advantage for the A10-9620P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The A10-9620P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8400 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9620P scores 2,514 against the Core 2 Duo P8400's 2,497 — a 0.7% lead for the A10-9620P.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+50% | 2.26 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+11% | 2.26 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,514 | 2,497 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 485 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-9620P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A10-9620P versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8400 — the Core 2 Duo P8400 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9620P supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9620P) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo P8400) — the A10-9620P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | 1066+26550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+838860700% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9620P) vs true (Core 2 Duo P8400). The A10-9620P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core 2 Duo P8400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9620P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9620P rivals Core i3-7100U; Core 2 Duo P8400 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.
| Feature | A10-9620P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P8400
