FX-9800P vs Xeon L7455

FX-9800P vs Xeon L7455 Performance Spectrum

FX-9800P

4 / 4

2,460

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L7455

2,494

+1.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-9800P vs Xeon L7455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-9800P vs Xeon L7455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-9800P

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L7455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 2,494).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon L7455 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon L7455

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L7455 better than FX-9800P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L7455 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-9800P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L7455 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L7455 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L7455 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon L7455 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-9800P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.0% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-9800P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-9800P vs Xeon L7455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-9800P

The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L7455

The Xeon L7455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,494 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-9800P is built on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-9800P scores 2,460 against the Xeon L7455's 2,494 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon L7455.

Feature	FX-9800P	Xeon L7455
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+27%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (per module)	—
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	2,460	2,494+1%