CPU
GPU
GeForce 615
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 615 is positioned at rank 367 and the GeForce GTS 240 is on rank 192, so the GeForce GTS 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 615
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 615 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 240 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTS 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 615.
| Insight | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 615 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 615 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 161.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+161.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 615 and GeForce GTS 240
GeForce 615
The GeForce 615 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 505 points.
GeForce GTS 240
The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 615 scores 505 and the GeForce GTS 240 reaches 515 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 615 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTS 240 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 615) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 240). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 615) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 505 | 515+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+33% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 256 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 615 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 240 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTS 240 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 615) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTS 240) — the GeForce 615 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 615) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce 615) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 615) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Fermi) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 615 draws 10W versus the GeForce GTS 240's 106W — a 165.5% difference. The GeForce 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 615) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 240). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-91% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5+931% | 4.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 615 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTS 240 launched at $80 and now averages $40. The GeForce 615 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.7 (GeForce 615) vs 12.9 (GeForce GTS 240) — the GeForce 615 offers 161.2% better value. The GeForce 615 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-38% | $80 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-63% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.7+161% | 12.9 |
| Codename | GP108 | GF106 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #657 | #791 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 615 and GeForce GTS 240
