
GeForce 615

GeForce GTS 240
GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 615
2017Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 106W, a 96W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTS 240
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 615 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$80 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 10.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌960% higher power demand at 106W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 615
The GeForce 615 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 505 points.

GeForce GTS 240
The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 615 scores 505 and the GeForce GTS 240 reaches 515 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 615 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTS 240 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 615) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 240). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 615) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 505 | 515+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+33% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 256 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 615 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 240 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTS 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 615 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 615) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTS 240) — the GeForce 615 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 615) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce 615) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 615) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Fermi) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 615 draws 10W versus the GeForce GTS 240's 106W — a 165.5% difference. The GeForce 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 615) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 240). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-91% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5+931% | 4.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 615 came in at $50, while the GeForce GTS 240 launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce 615 was 37.5% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.1 (GeForce 615) vs 6.4 (GeForce GTS 240) — the GeForce 615 offers 57.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 615 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 615 | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-38% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1+58% | 6.4 |
| Codename | GP108 | GF106 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #657 | #791 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














