GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240

NVIDIA

GeForce 615

2017Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 240

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 615

2017

Why buy it

  • 9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Delivers 56.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Draws 10W instead of 106W, a 96W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTS 240

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 615 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 60% HIGHER MSRP
    $80 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 10.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 960% higher power demand at 106W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 615 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTS 240 instead at 515 vs 505, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 615 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 615 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 56.9% (10.1 vs 6.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 615 vs GeForce GTS 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 615

The GeForce 615 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 505 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 240

The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 615 scores 505 and the GeForce GTS 240 reaches 515 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 615 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTS 240 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 615) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 240). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 615) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240).

FeatureGeForce 615GeForce GTS 240
G3D Mark Score
505
515+2%
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS+33%
0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
144 KB
256 KB+78%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 615GeForce GTS 240
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 615 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 240 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTS 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 615 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 615) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTS 240) — the GeForce 615 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 615GeForce GTS 240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 615) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 615GeForce GTS 240
DirectX
12 (11_0)+8%
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.6+44%
3.2
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce 615) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 615) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240).

FeatureGeForce 615GeForce GTS 240
Encoder
No NVENC (Fermi)
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 615 draws 10W versus the GeForce GTS 240's 106W — a 165.5% difference. The GeForce 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 615) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 240). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 615GeForce GTS 240
TDP
10W-91%
106W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
50.5+931%
4.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 615 came in at $50, while the GeForce GTS 240 launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce 615 was 37.5% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.1 (GeForce 615) vs 6.4 (GeForce GTS 240) — the GeForce 615 offers 57.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 615 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 615GeForce GTS 240
MSRP
$50-38%
$80
Performance per Dollar
10.1+58%
6.4
Codename
GP108
GF106
Release
May 17 2017
September 13 2010
Ranking
#657
#791

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.