
GeForce 6150 vs GRID V100-8Q

GeForce 6150
Popular choices:

GRID V100-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 6150 is positioned at rank #713 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 37.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100-8Q.
| Insight | GeForce 6150 | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+37.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-37.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10,000), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 137400% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6150 | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+137400%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6150 and GRID V100-8Q

GeForce 6150
The GeForce 6150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22 points.

GRID V100-8Q
The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6150 scores 22 versus the GRID V100-8Q's 16 — the GeForce 6150 leads by 37.5%. The GeForce 6150 is built on Pascal while the GRID V100-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6150) vs 640 (GRID V100-8Q). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22+38% | 16 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+110% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1306 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 320 KB+122% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6150 | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6150) vs 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) — the GRID V100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6150 draws 10W versus the GRID V100-8Q's 225W — a 183% difference. The GeForce 6150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6150) vs 350W (GRID V100-8Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 6150 | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-96% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2+2100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6150 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GRID V100-8Q launched at $10000 and now averages $10000. The GeForce 6150 costs 99.9% less ($9990 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (GeForce 6150) vs 0.0 (GRID V100-8Q) — the GeForce 6150 offers 100+% better value. The GeForce 6150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 6150 | GRID V100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-100% | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-100% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GP108 | GM107 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #657 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















