GeForce 6150 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6150 is positioned at rank 713 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M is on rank 225, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150

#702

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

14873%

#704

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

13482%

#705

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

13447%

#709

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

12227%

#710

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

12144%

#712

MOBILITY RADEON 9600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#713

GeForce 6150

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

100%

#714

RADEON E4690

MSRP: $558|Avg: $558

100%

#715

MOBILITY RADEON X300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

93%

#716

MOBILITY RADEON X700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

92%

#717

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

90%

#718

RADEON X800 SE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

89%

#719

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

75%

#720

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

70%

#721

GeForce 7800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

62%

#722

RADEON 9600SE

MSRP: $65|Avg: $65

58%

#723

Radeon X1200

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

56%

#724

Radeon 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

55%

#725

GeForce 6800

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

52%

#726

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

51%

#727

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

49%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

96%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

94%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

91%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

91%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

89%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

82%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

79%

#210

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3212%

#225

RADEON XPRESS 200M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

99%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

98%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

94%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

80%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON XPRESS 200M uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6150.

Insight	GeForce 6150	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON XPRESS 200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 6150 Benchmark Check

RADEON XPRESS 200M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6150 and RADEON XPRESS 200M

GeForce 6150

The GeForce 6150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22 points.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6150 scores 22 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M reaches 23 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6150 is built on Pascal while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6150) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6150	RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score	22	23+5%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS+562%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1030 MHz
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 6150	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6150) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6150	RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6150) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 6150	RADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX	9.0c	9_0
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 6150) vs None (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Decoder: PureVideo (VP1) vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 6150) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

Feature	GeForce 6150	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo (VP1)	MPEG-2
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6150 draws 10W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 6150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6150) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.