
GeForce 6150SE

Radeon X1200
GeForce 6150SE vs Radeon X1200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6150SE vs Radeon X1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6150SE vs Radeon X1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6150SE
2017Why buy it
- β Costs $50 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- β Delivers 102% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- β Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (25 vs 33).
- β2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1200
2019Why buy it
- β +32% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β GeForce 6150SE is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1200 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- β2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- β166.7% HIGHER MSRP$80 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- β400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6150SE vs Radeon X1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6150SE
The GeForce 6150SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25 points.

Radeon X1200
The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6150SE scores 25 versus the Radeon X1200's 33 β the Radeon X1200 leads by 32%. The GeForce 6150SE is built on Pascal while the Radeon X1200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6150SE) vs 384 (Radeon X1200). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150SE) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6150SE | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25 | 33+32% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+1% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz+1% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+50% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6150SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6150SE | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6150SE and 64-bit on the Radeon X1200. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6150SE) vs 128 KB (Radeon X1200) β the GeForce 6150SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6150SE | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6150SE draws 10W versus the Radeon X1200's 50W β a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 6150SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6150SE) vs 350W (Radeon X1200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 6150SE | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-80% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+257% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6150SE came in at $30, while the Radeon X1200 launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce 6150SE was 62.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (GeForce 6150SE) vs 0.4 (Radeon X1200) β the GeForce 6150SE offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1200 (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce 6150SE | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-63% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8+100% | 0.4 |
| Codename | GP108 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #657 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














