
GeForce 6800 GS

RADEON HD7450
GeForce 6800 GS vs RADEON HD7450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6800 GS vs RADEON HD7450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6800 GS vs RADEON HD7450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6800 GS
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD7450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌398% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 4.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
RADEON HD7450
2012Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 416.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6800 GS vs RADEON HD7450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6800 GS
The GeForce 6800 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.

RADEON HD7450
The RADEON HD7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 199 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6800 GS scores 192 and the RADEON HD7450 reaches 199 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6800 GS is built on G9x while the RADEON HD7450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 6800 GS) vs 1,792 (RADEON HD7450).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GS | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 192 | 199+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 1792+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6800 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD7450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GS | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6800 GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD7450 carries 512 MB. RADEON HD7450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 6800 GS and 128-bit on the RADEON HD7450.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GS | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800 GS) vs 11.2 (RADEON HD7450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GS | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.2+24% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6800 GS) vs VCE 1.0 (RADEON HD7450). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GS | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6800 GS draws 150W versus the RADEON HD7450's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce 6800 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800 GS) vs 350W (RADEON HD7450). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 216mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GS | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 216mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6800 GS came in at $249, while the RADEON HD7450 launched at $50. On MSRP, RADEON HD7450 was 79.9% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (GeForce 6800 GS) vs 4.0 (RADEON HD7450) — the RADEON HD7450 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD7450 (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 GS | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $50-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 4.0+400% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Tahiti |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #825 | #454 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














