GeForce 7000M
VS
GeForce FX Go5650

GeForce 7000M vs GeForce FX Go5650

NVIDIA

GeForce 7000M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5650

2011Core: 810 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7000M is positioned at rank 735 and the GeForce FX Go5650 is on rank 334, so the GeForce FX Go5650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7000M

#725
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
41758%
#727
37854%
#728
37754%
#732
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
34331%
#733
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
34096%
#735
GeForce 7000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
85%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
77%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
77%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
62%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
58%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
38%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
38%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
31%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
23%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
23%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
19%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
15%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
15%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
12%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5650

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
8534%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8199%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
8104%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8089%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8073%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
8027%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
7926%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
7896%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
7824%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
7802%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
7708%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
7692%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
7553%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
7548%
#318
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
9412%
#333
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#334
GeForce FX Go5650
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#335
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#336
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
96%
#338
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
89%
#339
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
85%
#340
RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
80%
#341
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
78%
#342
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
74%
#344
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
68%
#345
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
68%
#346
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
68%
#347
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
67%
#348
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX Go5650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 30.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7000M.

InsightGeForce 7000MGeForce FX Go5650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-30.8%)
Leading raw performance (+30.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX Go5650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7000M and GeForce FX Go5650

NVIDIA

GeForce 7000M

The GeForce 7000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5650

The GeForce FX Go5650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7000M scores 13 versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 17 — the GeForce FX Go5650 leads by 30.8%. The GeForce 7000M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce FX Go5650 uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 7000M) vs 336 (GeForce FX Go5650). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 7000M) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5650).

FeatureGeForce 7000MGeForce FX Go5650
G3D Mark Score
13
17+31%
Architecture
Maxwell
Rankine
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+14%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
1.089 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
56+133%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 7000MGeForce FX Go5650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7000M comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX Go5650 has 512 MB. The GeForce FX Go5650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 7000M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce FX Go5650) — the GeForce 7000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 7000MGeForce FX Go5650
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7000M) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5650). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 7000MGeForce FX Go5650
DirectX
9.0c
9.0a
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 7000M) vs VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5650). Decoder: PureVideo vs VPE 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 7000M) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5650).

FeatureGeForce 7000MGeForce FX Go5650
Encoder
No
VPE 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo
VPE 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7000M draws 33W versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 7000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7000M) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5650). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 7000MGeForce FX Go5650
TDP
33W-78%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
0.4+300%
0.1