
GeForce 7000M

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
GeForce 7000M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 7000M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 7000M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 7000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅+85.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7 vs 13).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7000M vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 7000M
The GeForce 7000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7000M scores 13 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce 7000M leads by 85.7%. The GeForce 7000M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 7000M) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 7000M) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).
| Feature | GeForce 7000M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13+86% | 7 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+33% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+21% | 0.7488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7000M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7000M has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 7000M and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 7000M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce 7000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 7000M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7000M) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7000M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c+11% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1+62% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 7000M) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: PureVideo vs No.
| Feature | GeForce 7000M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7000M draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 7000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7000M) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 216mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 7000M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 216mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 7000M (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 7000M | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Codename | GM108 | GF104 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #847 | #683 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













