G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 7300 GT vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 7300 GT vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 7300 GT

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Measures 170mm instead of 229mm, a 59mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌500% higher power demand at 450W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅2222.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 3690.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 450W, a 375W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌34.7% longer card at 229mm vs 170mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2222.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6246% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 124), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 7300 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 12nm, 84 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $60 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $89, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3690.5% (52.8 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 7300 GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 7300 GT vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 7300 GT

The GeForce 7300 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7300 GT scores 124 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 6246%. The GeForce 7300 GT is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	124	7,869+6246%
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	10752+1100%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	40 TFLOPS+1240%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1860 MHz+12%	1665 MHz
ROPs	112+250%	32
TMUs	336+500%	56
L1 Cache	10.5 MB+1093%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7300 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 7300 GT and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce 7300 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	4 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	9.0c	12+33%
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6+119%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7300 GT) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	None	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV,H.264	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7300 GT draws 450W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 170mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	450W	75W-83%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	170mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	0.3	104.9+34867%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 7300 GT came in at $89, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce 7300 GT was 40.3% cheaper ($60 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3671.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 7300 GT (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$89-40%	$149
Performance per Dollar	1.4	52.8+3671%
Codename	GA102	TU117
Release	January 27 2022	April 23 2019
Ranking	#19	#323

Search GeForce 7300 GT on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.