GeForce 310M vs GeForce 7300 GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 310M

2015Core: 549 MHzBoost: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 7300 GT

2022Core: 1560 MHzBoost: 1860 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 7300 GT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 7300 GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 7300 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 33W instead of 450W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 7300 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

GeForce 7300 GT

2022

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce 310M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 7300 GT is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 1263.6% higher power demand at 450W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 7300 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 310M instead at 127 vs 124, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 7300 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 84 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7300 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce 7300 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 310M

The GeForce 310M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7300 GT

The GeForce 7300 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310M scores 127 and the GeForce 7300 GT reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 7300 GT uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310M) vs 10,752 (GeForce 7300 GT). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 310M) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce 7300 GT). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1860 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 7300 GT
G3D Mark Score
127+2%
124
Architecture
Maxwell
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
384
10752+2700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
40 TFLOPS+9388%
Boost Clock
549 MHz
1860 MHz+239%
ROPs
8
112+1300%
TMUs
24
336+1300%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
10.5 MB+5426%
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 7300 GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 310M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7300 GT carries 256 MB. GeForce 310M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310M and 128-bit on the GeForce 7300 GT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 310M) vs 6 MB (GeForce 7300 GT) — the GeForce 7300 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 7300 GT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310M) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7300 GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 7300 GT
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310M) vs None (GeForce 7300 GT). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310M) vs MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce 7300 GT).

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 7300 GT
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
MPEG-2,WMV,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310M draws 33W versus the GeForce 7300 GT's 450W — a 172.7% difference. The GeForce 310M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310M) vs 350W (GeForce 7300 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 7300 GT
TDP
33W-93%
450W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
170mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75-6%
Perf/Watt
3.8+1167%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 7300 GT (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 310MGeForce 7300 GT
MSRP
$89
Codename
GM108
GA102
Release
March 13 2015
January 27 2022
Ranking
#880
#19

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.