
GeForce 310M

GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 310M vs GeForce 9200M GS Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 310M vs GeForce 9200M GS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 310M vs GeForce 9200M GS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 310M
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌106.3% higher power demand at 33W vs 16W.
GeForce 9200M GS
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 16W instead of 33W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 310M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 310M vs GeForce 9200M GS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 310M
The GeForce 310M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 310M scores 127 and the GeForce 9200M GS reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9200M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310M) vs 256 (GeForce 9200M GS). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 310M) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 310M | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127 | 129+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 0.5084 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 549 MHz | 993 MHz+81% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 310M | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 310M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9200M GS carries 256 MB. GeForce 310M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310M and 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GS.
| Feature | GeForce 310M | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 310M | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310M) vs No (GeForce 9200M GS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GS).
| Feature | GeForce 310M | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 310M draws 33W versus the GeForce 9200M GS's 16W — a 69.4% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310M) vs 350W (GeForce 9200M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 310M | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 16W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.8 | 8.1+113% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GS (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 310M | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #880 | #864 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














