GeForce 310M vs GeForce G210M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce G210M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce G210M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310M

2015

Why buy it

✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌106.3% higher power demand at 33W vs 16W.

GeForce G210M

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 16W instead of 33W, a 17W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 310M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 310M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce G210M instead at 129 vs 127, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 310M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce G210M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce G210M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 310M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 310M vs GeForce G210M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 310M

The GeForce 310M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310M scores 127 and the GeForce G210M reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce G210M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310M) vs 256 (GeForce G210M). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 310M) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 993 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 310M	GeForce G210M
G3D Mark Score	127	129+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	0.5084 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock	549 MHz	993 MHz+81%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 310M	GeForce G210M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310M and 128-bit on the GeForce G210M.

Feature	GeForce 310M	GeForce G210M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310M) vs 10.1 (GeForce G210M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 310M	GeForce G210M
DirectX	10.1	10.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310M) vs No (GeForce G210M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce G210M).

Feature	GeForce 310M	GeForce G210M
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310M draws 33W versus the GeForce G210M's 16W — a 69.4% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310M) vs 350W (GeForce G210M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.