GeForce 7300 GT vs Quadro FX 380M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7300 GT is positioned at rank 326 and the Quadro FX 380M is on rank 161, so the Quadro FX 380M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7300 GT

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

5219%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

5014%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

4955%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4947%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4937%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

4909%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

4847%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4829%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4784%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

4771%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

4714%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4704%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

4619%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4616%

#311

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

5755%

#326

GeForce 7300 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

100%

#327

Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $40

94%

#329

GeForce 7950 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

83%

#330

RADEON X550XT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $40

81%

#334

Radeon X1650 Pro

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

61%

#336

RADEON X550

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

61%

#337

Radeon HD 8350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $39

59%

#339

Radeon X1950 GT

MSRP: $140|Avg: $49

55%

#340

GeForce 6600 GT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

52%

#341

RADEON X600 PRO

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

49%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380M

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

94%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

88%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

87%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

86%

#146

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1831%

#161

Quadro FX 380M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

93%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

89%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

89%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

89%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

87%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

86%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 7300 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2008). The GeForce 7300 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 380M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 7300 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 380M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 7300 GT	Quadro FX 380M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Longevity	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 7300 GT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 7300 GT Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 380M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7300 GT and Quadro FX 380M

GeForce 7300 GT

The GeForce 7300 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Quadro FX 380M

The Quadro FX 380M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 7300 GT scores 124 and the Quadro FX 380M reaches 121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7300 GT is built on Ampere while the Quadro FX 380M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380M). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380M).

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	Quadro FX 380M
G3D Mark Score	124+2%	121
Architecture	Ampere	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	10752+4380%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	40 TFLOPS+6330%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	112+250%	32
TMUs	336+320%	80
L2 Cache	6 MB+2300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	Quadro FX 380M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7300 GT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380M has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 380M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380M) — the GeForce 7300 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	Quadro FX 380M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+2300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (Quadro FX 380M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	Quadro FX 380M
DirectX	9.0c	11.1 (FL10_1)+23%
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	2.1	3.3+57%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7300 GT) vs VP4 (Quadro FX 380M). Decoder: PureVideo vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce 7300 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro FX 380M).

Feature	GeForce 7300 GT	Quadro FX 380M
Encoder	None	VP4
Decoder	PureVideo	VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV,H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7300 GT draws 450W versus the Quadro FX 380M's 189W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro FX 380M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7300 GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.