GeForce 7500 LE
VS
GeForce 9100M G

GeForce 7500 LE vs GeForce 9100M G

NVIDIA

GeForce 7500 LE

2013Core: 967 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9100M G

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7500 LE is positioned at rank 677 and the GeForce 9100M G is on rank 598, so the GeForce 9100M G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7500 LE

#667
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
7646%
#669
6931%
#670
6913%
#674
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
6286%
#675
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
6243%
#677
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#678
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
100%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#680
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#681
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
96%
#682
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
94%
#683
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
91%
#684
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
91%
#685
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
86%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
83%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
80%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
77%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
75%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
74%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
72%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9100M G

#588
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3919%
#590
3553%
#591
3544%
#595
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3222%
#596
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3200%
#598
GeForce 9100M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
100%
#599
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#600
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
100%
#601
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
100%
#602
Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#603
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
99%
#604
Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#605
Radeon HD 8610G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#606
94%
#607
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#608
GeForce 9800M GS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#609
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#610
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
93%
#611
92%
#612
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 7500 LE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9100M G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9100M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9100M G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+46.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7500 LE and GeForce 9100M G

NVIDIA

GeForce 7500 LE

The GeForce 7500 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9100M G

The GeForce 9100M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 7500 LE scores 85 and the GeForce 9100M G reaches 83 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7500 LE is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9100M G uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 384 (GeForce 9100M G).

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
G3D Mark Score
85+2%
83
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+100%
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7500 LE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9100M G has 512 MB. The GeForce 9100M G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9100M G). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
DirectX
9.0c
11.1 (10_0)+23%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 7500 LE) vs None (GeForce 9100M G). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 9100M G).

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo
PureVideo VP3
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7500 LE draws 30W versus the GeForce 9100M G's 33W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce 7500 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 350W (GeForce 9100M G). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
TDP
30W-9%
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
106mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80
Perf/Watt
2.8+12%
2.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 7500 LE launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 9100M G launched at $30 and now averages $10. The GeForce 9100M G costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 8.3 (GeForce 9100M G) — the GeForce 9100M G offers 45.6% better value. The GeForce 9100M G is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce 9100M G
MSRP
$60
$30-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$10-33%
Performance per Dollar
5.7
8.3+46%
Codename
N14P-GT
GM108
Release
April 1 2013
March 13 2015
Ranking
#616
#847