GeForce 7500 LE
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce 7500 LE vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 7500 LE

2013Core: 967 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 7500 LE is positioned at rank #677 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7500 LE

#667
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
7646%
#669
6931%
#670
6913%
#674
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
6286%
#675
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
6243%
#677
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#678
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
100%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#680
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#681
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
96%
#682
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
94%
#683
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
91%
#684
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
91%
#685
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
86%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
83%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
80%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
77%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
75%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
74%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
72%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 7500 LE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9157.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7500 LE.

InsightGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-9157.6%)
Leading raw performance (+9157.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1500%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1751.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce 7500 LE.

InsightGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1751.5%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7500 LE and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 7500 LE

The GeForce 7500 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7500 LE scores 85 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 9157.6%. The GeForce 7500 LE is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
85
7,869+9158%
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768
896+17%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7500 LE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
4 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
9.0c
12+33%
Vulkan
None
1.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6+119%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 7500 LE) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
No
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7500 LE draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce 7500 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
168mm
229mm
Height
106mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
65°C-7%
70°C
Perf/Watt
2.8
104.9+3646%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 7500 LE launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce 7500 LE costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1740.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 7500 LEGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$60-60%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$15-80%
$75
Performance per Dollar
5.7
104.9+1740%
Codename
N14P-GT
TU117
Release
April 1 2013
April 23 2019
Ranking
#616
#323