
GeForce 7500 LE

Radeon HD 3200
GeForce 7500 LE vs Radeon HD 3200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 7500 LE vs Radeon HD 3200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 7500 LE vs Radeon HD 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 7500 LE
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 186W, a 156W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Radeon HD 3200
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌520% higher power demand at 186W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7500 LE vs Radeon HD 3200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 7500 LE
The GeForce 7500 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.

Radeon HD 3200
The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7500 LE scores 85 and the Radeon HD 3200 reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7500 LE is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 3200 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200).
| Feature | GeForce 7500 LE | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 85+4% | 82 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 7500 LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 7500 LE | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7500 LE has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3200 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 7500 LE and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200.
| Feature | GeForce 7500 LE | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7500 LE | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 7500 LE) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3200). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 7500 LE | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7500 LE draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 3200's 186W — a 144.4% difference. The GeForce 7500 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3200). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 7500 LE | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+600% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 7500 LE came in at $60, while the Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3200 was 16.7% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 7500 LE) vs 1.6 (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 3200 offers 14.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 7500 LE (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 7500 LE | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $50-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 1.6+14% |
| Codename | N14P-GT | Cayman |
| Release | April 1 2013 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #616 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














