
GeForce 7650 GS

GeForce 9650M GT
GeForce 7650 GS vs GeForce 9650M GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 7650 GS vs GeForce 9650M GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 7650 GS vs GeForce 9650M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 7650 GS
2013Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
GeForce 9650M GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 7650 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7650 GS vs GeForce 9650M GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 7650 GS
The GeForce 7650 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 134 points.

GeForce 9650M GT
The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7650 GS scores 134 and the GeForce 9650M GT reaches 137 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7650 GS is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9650M GT uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 7650 GS) vs 640 (GeForce 9650M GT).
| Feature | GeForce 7650 GS | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 134 | 137+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+20% | 640 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7650 GS | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7650 GS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9650M GT carries 1 GB. GeForce 9650M GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 7650 GS and 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GT.
| Feature | GeForce 7650 GS | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7650 GS) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 7650 GS | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.1 (10_0)+23% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 7650 GS) vs No NVENC (G96) (GeForce 9650M GT). Decoder: No vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 7650 GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GT).
| Feature | GeForce 7650 GS | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No NVENC (G96) |
| Decoder | No | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7650 GS draws 30W versus the GeForce 9650M GT's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce 7650 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7650 GS) vs 350W (GeForce 9650M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 7650 GS | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5+150% | 1.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 7650 GS came in at $150, while the GeForce 9650M GT launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 9650M GT was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (GeForce 7650 GS) vs 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GT) — the GeForce 9650M GT offers 55.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9650M GT (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 7650 GS | GeForce 9650M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 1.4+56% |
| Codename | N14P-GT | GM107 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | October 27 2015 |
| Ranking | #616 | #671 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














