GeForce 7800 GT vs Quadro NVS 510M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 7800 GT vs Quadro NVS 510M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 7800 GT vs Quadro NVS 510M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 7800 GT

2013

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 7800 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 7800 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (244 vs 238), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 7800 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 7800 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 7800 GT vs Quadro NVS 510M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 7800 GT

The GeForce 7800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 244 points. Launch price was $699.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 7800 GT scores 244 and the Quadro NVS 510M reaches 238 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7800 GT is built on Kepler while the Quadro NVS 510M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce 7800 GT) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 510M). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce 7800 GT) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M).

Feature	GeForce 7800 GT	Quadro NVS 510M
G3D Mark Score	244+3%	238
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2880+650%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+673%	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	240 KB	768 KB+220%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 7800 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro NVS 510M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 7800 GT	Quadro NVS 510M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 7800 GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro NVS 510M carries 1 GB. Quadro NVS 510M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 7800 GT and 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce 7800 GT) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro NVS 510M) — the GeForce 7800 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 7800 GT	Quadro NVS 510M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	1 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7800 GT draws 250W versus the Quadro NVS 510M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro NVS 510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7800 GT) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 510M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 7800 GT	Quadro NVS 510M
TDP	250W	100W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	228mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.0	2.4+140%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 7800 GT (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 7800 GT	Quadro NVS 510M
MSRP	$449	—
Codename	GK110B	GF110
Release	November 7 2013	February 22 2011
Ranking	#278	#733

Search GeForce 7800 GT on Amazon

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.