
GeForce 7900 GS

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce 7900 GS vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 7900 GS vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 7900 GS vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 7900 GS
2008Why buy it
- ✅Measures 198mm instead of 229mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌73.8% HIGHER MSRP$259 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($259 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅1076.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 5120.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅GeForce 7900 GS is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌15.7% longer card at 229mm vs 198mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7900 GS vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 7900 GS
The GeForce 7900 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 262 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 7900 GS scores 262 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2903.4%. The GeForce 7900 GS is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 65 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 262 | 7,869+2903% |
| Architecture | G9x | Turing |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 896+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 7900 GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 7900 GS and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 4 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12+33% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 7900 GS) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 7900 GS) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | PureVideo | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7900 GS draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 198mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 198mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.7 | 104.9+6071% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 7900 GS came in at $259, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 42.5% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 5180% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $259 | $149-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 52.8+5180% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | TU117 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #825 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














