GeForce 7900 GS vs Quadro FX 3500

NVIDIA

GeForce 7900 GS

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 7900 GS vs Quadro FX 3500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 7900 GS vs Quadro FX 3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 7900 GS vs Quadro FX 3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 7900 GS

2008

Why buy it

  • 2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,340 less on MSRP ($259 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 510.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($259 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 7900 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 517.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,599 MSRPvs$259 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $259 MSRP).
  • 26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 7900 GS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 3500 instead at 265 vs 262, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 7900 GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7900 GS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,340 cheaper on MSRP at $259 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 510.4% (1.0 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 7900 GS vs Quadro FX 3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7900 GS

The GeForce 7900 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 262 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 7900 GS scores 262 and the Quadro FX 3500 reaches 265 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7900 GS is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 3500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500).

FeatureGeForce 7900 GSQuadro FX 3500
G3D Mark Score
262
265+1%
Architecture
G9x
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
65 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
224
240+7%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 7900 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 7900 GSQuadro FX 3500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 7900 GS and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500.

FeatureGeForce 7900 GSQuadro FX 3500
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 7900 GS draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 3500's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 7900 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 7900 GSQuadro FX 3500
TDP
150W-21%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
198mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
1.7+21%
1.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 7900 GS came in at $259, while the Quadro FX 3500 launched at $1599. On MSRP, GeForce 7900 GS was 83.8% cheaper ($1340 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) — the GeForce 7900 GS offers 400% better value.

FeatureGeForce 7900 GSQuadro FX 3500
MSRP
$259-84%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
1.0+400%
0.2
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GT200B
Release
July 15 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#825
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.