GeForce 7900 GS vs Quadro FX 3500
GeForce 7900 GS
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 3500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 7900 GS is positioned at rank 692 and the Quadro FX 3500 is on rank 408, so the Quadro FX 3500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7900 GS
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7900 GS.
| Insight | GeForce 7900 GS | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 7900 GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 7900 GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $1,599), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3061.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 7900 GS | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3061.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 7900 GS and Quadro FX 3500
GeForce 7900 GS
The GeForce 7900 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 262 points.
Quadro FX 3500
The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 7900 GS scores 262 and the Quadro FX 3500 reaches 265 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 7900 GS is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 3500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500).
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 262 | 265+1% |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 7900 GS draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 3500's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 7900 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 198mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.7+21% | 1.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 7900 GS launched at $259 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro FX 3500 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The GeForce 7900 GS costs 96.9% less ($1549 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (GeForce 7900 GS) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) — the GeForce 7900 GS offers 2500% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 7900 GS | Quadro FX 3500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $259-84% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-97% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2+2500% | 0.2 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200B |
| Release | July 15 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 7900 GS and Quadro FX 3500
