GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 825M

2015

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 100W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-7700K across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $152 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

2023

Why buy it

✅36.6% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($152 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌203% higher power demand at 100W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.6% in average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (772 vs 761), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A10-7700K makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 825M

The GeForce 825M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1071 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 761 points.

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 772 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 825M scores 761 and the Radeon R7 A10-7700K reaches 772 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 825M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 A10-7700K uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 825M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 825M) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 825M	Radeon R7 A10-7700K
G3D Mark Score	761	772+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS	20.48 TFLOPS+2167%
Boost Clock	1176 MHz	2500 MHz+113%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 825M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 825M	Radeon R7 A10-7700K
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 825M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-7700K carries 512 MB. GeForce 825M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 825M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7700K. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 825M) vs 2 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) — the Radeon R7 A10-7700K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 825M	Radeon R7 A10-7700K
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 825M draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7700K's 100W — a 100.8% difference. The GeForce 825M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 825M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 825M	Radeon R7 A10-7700K
TDP	33W-67%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	23.1+200%	7.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7700K (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 825M	Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP	—	$152
Codename	GM108	Navi 33
Release	August 26 2015	January 4 2023
Ranking	#768	#140

Search GeForce 825M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A10-7700K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.