GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce 840A

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 840A

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 341.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 373.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • GeForce 840A is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 341.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 605.7% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 1,115), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 373.7% (52.8 vs 11.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 840A

The GeForce 840A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 840A scores 1,115 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 605.7%. The GeForce 840A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 840A) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 840A) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 840AGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
1,115
7,869+606%
Architecture
Maxwell
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
384
896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+246%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1665 MHz+48%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
16
56+250%
L1 Cache
192 KB
896 KB+367%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 840AGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 840A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 840A and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650.

FeatureGeForce 840AGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 840A) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 840AGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.1
1.4+27%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 840A) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 840A) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce 840AGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
NVENC (Maxwell)
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
NVDEC (Maxwell)
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 840A draws 33W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 840A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 840A) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 840AGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
33.8
104.9+210%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 840A came in at $100, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce 840A was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce 840A) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 371.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 840AGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$100-33%
$149
Performance per Dollar
11.2
52.8+371%
Codename
GM108
TU117
Release
March 17 2014
April 23 2019
Ranking
#850
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.