
GeForce 840A vs Quadro 2100M

GeForce 840A
Popular choices:

Quadro 2100M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 840A is positioned at rank 349 and the Quadro 2100M is on rank 107, so the Quadro 2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 840A
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2100M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 840A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2100M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 840A | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 840A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 840A and Quadro 2100M

GeForce 840A
The GeForce 840A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points.

Quadro 2100M
The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 840A scores 1,115 and the Quadro 2100M reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 840A is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 2100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 840A) vs 576 (Quadro 2100M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 840A) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M).
| Feature | GeForce 840A | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,115+1% | 1,100 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 576+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+12% | 0.7684 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 48+200% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+300% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 840A | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 840A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2100M has 4 GB. The Quadro 2100M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 840A) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 2100M) — the GeForce 840A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 840A | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 840A draws 33W versus the Quadro 2100M's 55W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 840A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 840A) vs 350W (Quadro 2100M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 840A | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-40% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8+69% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 840A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 840A | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GK106 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #850 | #788 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












