GeForce 840M
VS
GeForce 940M

GeForce 840M vs GeForce 940M

NVIDIA

GeForce 840M

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 940M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 840M is positioned at rank #352 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 840M

#342
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
987%
#344
895%
#345
892%
#349
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
811%
#350
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
806%
#352
GeForce 840M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
99%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
97%
#361
97%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
95%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 940M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 840M.

InsightGeForce 840MGeForce 940M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 940M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 840M and GeForce 940M

NVIDIA

GeForce 840M

The GeForce 840M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 940M

The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 840M scores 1,100 and the GeForce 940M reaches 1,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 840M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 940M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 840M) vs 384 (GeForce 940M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 840M) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 940M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 840MGeForce 940M
G3D Mark Score
1,100
1,133+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
0.9032 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1176 MHz+5%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
24+50%
L1 Cache
192 KB
192 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 840MGeForce 940M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 840MGeForce 940M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 840M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 940M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 840MGeForce 940M
DirectX
11.0
12 (11_0)+9%
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 840M) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 940M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 840M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce 940M).

FeatureGeForce 840MGeForce 940M
Encoder
NVENC 2.0
NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD (VP6)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 840M draws 33W versus the GeForce 940M's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 940M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 840M) vs 350W (GeForce 940M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce 840MGeForce 940M
TDP
33W
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75
Perf/Watt
33.3
34.3+3%