
GeForce 840M

Radeon R7 M460
GeForce 840M vs Radeon R7 M460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 840M vs Radeon R7 M460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Deadlock

Honkai: Star Rail

Marvel Rivals

Naraka: Bladepoint

Overwatch 2
GeForce 840M vs Radeon R7 M460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 840M
2014Why buy it
- ✅307.3% more average FPS across 10 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Radeon R7 M460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 840M across 10 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 840M vs Radeon R7 M460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 840M
The GeForce 840M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.

Radeon R7 M460
The Radeon R7 M460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,069 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 840M scores 1,100 and the Radeon R7 M460 reaches 1,069 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 840M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M460 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 840M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M460). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 840M) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M460). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1125 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 840M | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,100+3% | 1,069 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 0.864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+100% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 840M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 840M | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 840M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M460 carries 512 MB. GeForce 840M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 840M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M460. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 840M) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M460) — the GeForce 840M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 840M | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 840M draws 33W versus the Radeon R7 M460's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 840M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M460). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce 840M | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.3+133% | 14.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 M460 (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 840M | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Codename | GM108 | Meso |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #854 | #861 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














