GeForce 845M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 845M

33

1,487

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

TITAN V

Iris Plus Graphics 650

15

1,500

+0.9%

Arc Graphics 130T

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 845M is positioned at rank #259 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 845M

#248

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

584%

#250

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

529%

#251

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

528%

#255

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

480%

#256

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

477%

#259

GeForce 845M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#261

GeForce 945A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#262

Intel UHD Graphics P630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#263

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#264

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

MSRP: $300|Avg: $75

99%

#269

GeForce GTX 960A

MSRP: $199|Avg: $60

94%

#270

Radeon HD 8770

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#272

Radeon R9 M295X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

92%

#273

GeForce GT 325M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 845M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce 845M	Iris Plus Graphics 650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 845M Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 845M and Iris Plus Graphics 650

GeForce 845M

The GeForce 845M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1071 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,487 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 650

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 845M scores 1,487 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 845M is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 845M) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 845M) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 845M	Iris Plus Graphics 650
G3D Mark Score	1,487	1,500
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm++
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS+2%	0.8832 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1176 MHz+2%	1150 MHz
ROPs	16+167%	6
TMUs	32	48+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 845M	Iris Plus Graphics 650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 845M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 0 MB. The GeForce 845M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce 845M	Iris Plus Graphics 650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 845M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 845M	Iris Plus Graphics 650
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 845M) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GeForce 845M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 650).

Feature	GeForce 845M	Iris Plus Graphics 650
Encoder	4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	QuickSync
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 845M draws 33W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 75% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 845M) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.