GeForce 8600 GT vs RADEON HD 6350
GeForce 8600 GT
Popular choices:
RADEON HD 6350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8600 GT is positioned at rank 704 and the RADEON HD 6350 is on rank 240, so the RADEON HD 6350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600 GT
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD 6350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD 6350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8600 GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8600 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8600 GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 98.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8600 GT and RADEON HD 6350
GeForce 8600 GT
The GeForce 8600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.
RADEON HD 6350
The RADEON HD 6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8600 GT scores 140 and the RADEON HD 6350 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8600 GT is built on G9x while the RADEON HD 6350 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8600 GT) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD 6350).
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 140 | 141 |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 1280+471% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8600 GT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD 6350 has 512 MB. The GeForce 8600 GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8600 GT) vs 11.2 (11_0) (RADEON HD 6350). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2 (11_0)+12% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8600 GT) vs None (RADEON HD 6350). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8600 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (RADEON HD 6350).
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8600 GT draws 150W versus the RADEON HD 6350's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The GeForce 8600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8600 GT) vs 350W (RADEON HD 6350). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 173mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-19% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 173mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+12% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8600 GT launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON HD 6350 launched at $30 and now averages $30. The GeForce 8600 GT costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.3 (GeForce 8600 GT) vs 4.7 (RADEON HD 6350) — the GeForce 8600 GT offers 97.9% better value. The RADEON HD 6350 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GT | RADEON HD 6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $30-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3+98% | 4.7 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Cayman |
| Release | July 15 2008 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #825 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8600 GT and RADEON HD 6350
