GeForce 8600 GTS vs Quadro FX 580
GeForce 8600 GTS
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8600 GTS is positioned at rank 698 and the Quadro FX 580 is on rank 355, so the Quadro FX 580 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600 GTS
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8600 GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 580.
| Insight | GeForce 8600 GTS | Quadro FX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8600 GTS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8600 GTS holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $500), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1360.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8600 GTS | Quadro FX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1360.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8600 GTS and Quadro FX 580
GeForce 8600 GTS
The GeForce 8600 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 185 points.
Quadro FX 580
The Quadro FX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8600 GTS scores 185 and the Quadro FX 580 reaches 181 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8600 GTS is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 580 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8600 GTS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 580).
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GTS | Quadro FX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 185+2% | 181 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GTS | Quadro FX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GTS | Quadro FX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8600 GTS draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 580's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8600 GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8600 GTS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 580). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GTS | Quadro FX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 198mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8600 GTS launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Quadro FX 580 launched at $199 and now averages $500. The GeForce 8600 GTS costs 93% less ($465 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GeForce 8600 GTS) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 580) — the GeForce 8600 GTS offers 1225% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 8600 GTS | Quadro FX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-93% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3+1225% | 0.4 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200B |
| Release | July 15 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8600 GTS and Quadro FX 580
