
GeForce 8600M GS

Quadro FX 350
GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Cyberpunk 2077

Deadlock

Destiny 2
GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8600M GS
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 350
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌99% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8600M GS
The GeForce 8600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 89 points.

Quadro FX 350
The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8600M GS scores 89 and the Quadro FX 350 reaches 86 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8600M GS is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 350 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8600M GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350).
| Feature | GeForce 8600M GS | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 89+3% | 86 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8600M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8600M GS | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8600M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350 carries 128 MB. GeForce 8600M GS gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8600M GS and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350.
| Feature | GeForce 8600M GS | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8600M GS draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 350's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8600M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8600M GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 8600M GS | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+20% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8600M GS came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 350 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce 8600M GS was 49.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (GeForce 8600M GS) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 350) — the GeForce 8600M GS offers 125% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 8600M GS | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-50% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9+125% | 0.4 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GT200B |
| Release | July 15 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














