GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8600M GS

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 36.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 370

2008

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
29% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8600M GS is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6% in PassMark G3D (89 vs 84), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8600M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8600M GS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 36.7% (0.9 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 8600M GS vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8600M GS

The GeForce 8600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 89 points.

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8600M GS scores 89 versus the Quadro FX 370's 84 — the GeForce 8600M GS leads by 6%. The GeForce 8600M GS is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8600M GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	GeForce 8600M GS	Quadro FX 370
G3D Mark Score	89+6%	84
Architecture	G9x	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	65 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	224	240+7%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8600M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8600M GS	Quadro FX 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8600M GS and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370.

Feature	GeForce 8600M GS	Quadro FX 370
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8600M GS) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 8600M GS	Quadro FX 370
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)+11%	10.0
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	3.3+57%	2.1
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8600M GS) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 8600M GS) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	GeForce 8600M GS	Quadro FX 370
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP2)	PureVideo 2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8600M GS draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8600M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8600M GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 8600M GS	Quadro FX 370
TDP	150W-21%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	0.6+50%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8600M GS came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce 8600M GS was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (GeForce 8600M GS) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce 8600M GS offers 28.6% better value.

Feature	GeForce 8600M GS	Quadro FX 370
MSRP	$100-22%	$129
Performance per Dollar	0.9+29%	0.7
Codename	NB9E-GTX	GT200B
Release	July 15 2008	November 11 2008
Ranking	#825	#815

Search GeForce 8600M GS on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.