GeForce 8600M GT
VS
Quadro FX 1500

GeForce 8600M GT vs Quadro FX 1500

NVIDIA

GeForce 8600M GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1500

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1500

#383
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
61554%
#398
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
100%
#399
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
100%
#400
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
100%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
96%
#402
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
96%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
92%
#404
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
83%
#406
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
83%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
75%
#409
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
71%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
67%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
67%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8600M GT.

InsightGeForce 8600M GTQuadro FX 1500
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1500 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8600M GT and Quadro FX 1500

NVIDIA

GeForce 8600M GT

The GeForce 8600M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1500

The Quadro FX 1500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8600M GT scores 164 and the Quadro FX 1500 reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8600M GT is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 1500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8600M GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1500).

FeatureGeForce 8600M GTQuadro FX 1500
G3D Mark Score
164
170+4%
Architecture
G9x
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
65 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
224
240+7%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8600M GTQuadro FX 1500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 8600M GTQuadro FX 1500
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8600M GT draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 1500's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8600M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8600M GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1500). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 8600M GTQuadro FX 1500
TDP
150W-21%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
1.1+22%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8600M GT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro FX 1500 launched at $699 and now averages $30. The GeForce 8600M GT costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 8600M GT) vs 5.7 (Quadro FX 1500) — the GeForce 8600M GT offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGeForce 8600M GTQuadro FX 1500
MSRP
$0-100%
$699
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$30
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
5.7
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GT200B
Release
July 15 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#825
#815