CPU
GPU
GeForce 8800 GTX
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8800 GTX is positioned at rank 698 and the FirePro 3D V5700 is on rank 355, so the FirePro 3D V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTX
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro 3D V5700 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The FirePro 3D V5700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8800 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8800 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (768 MB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V5700.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800 GTX and FirePro 3D V5700
GeForce 8800 GTX
The GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.
FirePro 3D V5700
The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800 GTX scores 556 and the FirePro 3D V5700 reaches 547 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GTX is built on G9x while the FirePro 3D V5700 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 556+2% | 547 |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 2048+814% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8800 GTX comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V5700 has 512 MB. The GeForce 8800 GTX offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB+50% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V5700). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5700).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800 GTX draws 150W versus the FirePro 3D V5700's 274W — a 58.5% difference. The GeForce 8800 GTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-45% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+85% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8800 GTX launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro 3D V5700 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The FirePro 3D V5700 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 21.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) — the FirePro 3D V5700 offers 97.3% better value. The FirePro 3D V5700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 8800 GTX | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $25-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 21.9+97% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Tahiti |
| Release | July 15 2008 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #825 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8800 GTX and FirePro 3D V5700
