GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R5 240

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GTX

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R5 240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R5 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R5 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8800 GTX

2008

Why buy it

  • 78.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 915.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $540 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 918.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800 GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8800 GTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 78.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 240 instead at 558 vs 556, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8800 GTX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $540 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 918.9% (9.5 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8800 GTX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R5 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800 GTX

The GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800 GTX scores 556 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800 GTX is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240).

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTXRadeon R5 240
G3D Mark Score
556
558
Architecture
G9x
GCN 1.0
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
320+43%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8800 GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 240 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTXRadeon R5 240
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8800 GTX has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 240 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800 GTX and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTXRadeon R5 240
VRAM Capacity
0.75 GB
2 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 12_0 (Radeon R5 240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTXRadeon R5 240
DirectX
10.0
12_0+20%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 240). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTXRadeon R5 240
Encoder
None
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP2)
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800 GTX draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTXRadeon R5 240
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
267mm
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
3.7
18.6+403%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8800 GTX came in at $599, while the Radeon R5 240 launched at $59. On MSRP, Radeon R5 240 was 90.2% cheaper ($540 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (GeForce 8800 GTX) vs 9.5 (Radeon R5 240) — the Radeon R5 240 offers 955.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 240 (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 8800 GTXRadeon R5 240
MSRP
$599
$59-90%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
9.5+956%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Oland
Release
July 15 2008
October 8 2013
Ranking
#825
#911

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.