
GeForce 9300GE

Radeon HD 3000
GeForce 9300GE vs Radeon HD 3000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9300GE vs Radeon HD 3000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9300GE vs Radeon HD 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9300GE
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 186W, a 153W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Radeon HD 3000
2011Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌463.6% higher power demand at 186W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9300GE vs Radeon HD 3000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300GE
The GeForce 9300GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Radeon HD 3000
The Radeon HD 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 96 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300GE scores 98 and the Radeon HD 3000 reaches 96 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300GE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 3000 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300GE) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3000). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300GE) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3000).
| Feature | GeForce 9300GE | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 98+2% | 96 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+166% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9300GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9300GE | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300GE and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300GE) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3000) — the GeForce 9300GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300GE | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300GE) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9300GE | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9300GE) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3000). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 9300GE | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300GE draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 3000's 186W — a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 9300GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300GE) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9300GE | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-82% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0+500% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9300GE came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 3000 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GeForce 9300GE) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 3000) — the GeForce 9300GE offers 5.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300GE (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 9300GE | Radeon HD 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0+5% | 1.9 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | March 13 2015 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #810 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














