GeForce 9400M vs RADEON X800 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9400M vs RADEON X800 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9400M vs RADEON X800 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9400M

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 300W, a 267W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

RADEON X800 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce 9400M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 XT is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌809.1% higher power demand at 300W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 XT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9400M instead at 101 vs 98, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X800 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9400M vs RADEON X800 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9400M

The GeForce 9400M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 101 points.

RADEON X800 XT

The RADEON X800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9400M scores 101 and the RADEON X800 XT reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400M is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X800 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400M) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 XT). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XT). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 9400M	RADEON X800 XT
G3D Mark Score	101+3%	98
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS	20.74 TFLOPS+2196%
Boost Clock	1176 MHz	2250 MHz+91%
ROPs	8	128+1500%
TMUs	24	288+1100%
L1 Cache	0.19 MB	1 MB+426%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9400M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9400M	RADEON X800 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9400M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 XT carries 256 MB. GeForce 9400M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400M and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400M) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 XT) — the RADEON X800 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9400M	RADEON X800 XT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9400M draws 33W versus the RADEON X800 XT's 300W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce 9400M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400M) vs 350W (RADEON X800 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 9400M	RADEON X800 XT
TDP	33W-89%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.1+933%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X800 XT (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 9400M	RADEON X800 XT
MSRP	—	$499
Codename	GM108	Navi 21
Release	March 13 2015	October 28 2020
Ranking	#847	#42

Search GeForce 9400M on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.