GeForce 945A vs GeForce MX130
GeForce 945A
Popular choices:
GeForce MX130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 945A is positioned at rank 262 and the GeForce MX130 is on rank 301, so the GeForce 945A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 945A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 945A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX130.
| Insight | GeForce 945A | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 945A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 945A holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 105.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 945A | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+105.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 945A and GeForce MX130
GeForce 945A
The GeForce 945A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1189 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,852 points.
GeForce MX130
The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 945A scores 1,852 and the GeForce MX130 reaches 1,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 945A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce MX130 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 945A) vs 384 (GeForce MX130). Raw compute: 0.9132 TFLOPS (GeForce 945A) vs 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130). Boost clocks: 1189 MHz vs 1242 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,852+3% | 1,805 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9132 TFLOPS | 0.9539 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1189 MHz | 1242 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 945A | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 40 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 945A draws 33W versus the GeForce MX130's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 945A) vs 350W (GeForce MX130). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce 945A | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1 | 60.2+7% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 945A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce MX130 launched at $120 and now averages $50. The GeForce 945A costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 74.1 (GeForce 945A) vs 36.1 (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce 945A offers 105.3% better value. The GeForce MX130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 945A | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-17% | $120 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.1+105% | 36.1 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #705 | #713 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 945A and GeForce MX130
