
FirePro M5100
Popular choices:

GeForce 945A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro M5100
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
GeForce 945A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro M5100
2013GeForce 945A
2015Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro M5100 better than GeForce 945A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce 945A make more sense than FirePro M5100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5100 and GeForce 945A

FirePro M5100
FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

GeForce 945A
GeForce 945A
The GeForce 945A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1189 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,852 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the GeForce 945A reaches 1,852 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 945A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 384 (GeForce 945A). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 0.9132 TFLOPS (GeForce 945A). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1189 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874+1% | 1,852 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS+9% | 0.9132 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1189 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 945A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro M5100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 945A has 512 MB. The FirePro M5100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M5100) vs 1 MB (GeForce 945A) — the GeForce 945A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 945A). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce 945A). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs H.264,HEVC (GeForce 945A).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the GeForce 945A's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 945A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 350W (GeForce 945A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 33W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5 | 56.1+349% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M5100 launched at $0 MSRP, while the GeForce 945A launched at $100. The FirePro M5100 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M5100) vs 18.5 (GeForce 945A) — the FirePro M5100 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 945A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce 945A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 18.5 |
| Codename | Venus | GM108 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #701 | #705 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












