
FirePro M5100 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie

FirePro M5100
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M5100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M5100 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M5100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M5100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $35), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 15.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M5100 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5100 and Radeon HD 7700-serie

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

Radeon HD 7700-serie
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the Radeon HD 7700-serie reaches 1,899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7700-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874 | 1,899+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+282% |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 925 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 512 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie has 512 MB. The FirePro M5100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M5100) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro M5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5+64% | 7.6 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M5100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159 and now averages $35. The FirePro M5100 costs 14.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 62.5 (FirePro M5100) vs 54.3 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the FirePro M5100 offers 15.1% better value. The FirePro M5100 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-14% | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.5+15% | 54.3 |
| Codename | Venus | Tahiti |
| Release | October 16 2013 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #701 | #431 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















