
FirePro 3D V7800 vs FirePro M5100

FirePro 3D V7800
Popular choices:

FirePro M5100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V7800 is positioned at rank #270 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V7800.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M5100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M5100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 33.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7800 and FirePro M5100

FirePro 3D V7800
The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the FirePro M5100 reaches 1,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro M5100 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 640 (FirePro M5100). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,867 | 1,874 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+251% | 0.992 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+220% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 256 KB (FirePro M5100) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (FL11_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the FirePro M5100's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The FirePro M5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 350W (FirePro M5100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 82mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 70mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.8 | 12.5+84% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro M5100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The FirePro M5100 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 62.5 (FirePro M5100) — the FirePro M5100 offers 33.8% better value. The FirePro 3D V7800 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.7 | 62.5+34% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Venus |
| Release | January 18 2014 | October 16 2013 |
| Ranking | #423 | #701 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















