Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 3D V7800 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 3D V7800

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics P630

2018Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 3D V7800 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 3D V7800
2 GB 274
1,867
+1.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Shared System RAM 15
1,848
0.0%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V7800 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V7800

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Intel UHD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro 3D V7800 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    659% HIGHER MSRP
    $759 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 18.5 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌1726.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics P630

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $659 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 651.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 274W, a 259W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V7800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,867 vs 1,848), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics P630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $659 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $759, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 651.3% (18.5 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V7800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V7800 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V7800

The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 reaches 1,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800Intel UHD Graphics P630
G3D Mark Score
1,867+1%
1,848
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
2048+967%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+656%
0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+967%
3
TMUs
128+433%
24
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800Intel UHD Graphics P630
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V7800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 carries 0 MB. FirePro 3D V7800 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V7800 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics P630.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800Intel UHD Graphics P630
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800Intel UHD Graphics P630
DirectX
11.0
12+9%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs Gen 9.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800Intel UHD Graphics P630
Encoder
UVD 2.3
Quick Sync (Coffee Lake)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
Gen 9.5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800Intel UHD Graphics P630
TDP
274W
15W-95%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
254mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1
—
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
6.8
123.2+1712%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V7800 came in at $759, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics P630 was 86.8% cheaper ($659 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 18.5 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) — the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers 640% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics P630 (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800Intel UHD Graphics P630
MSRP
$759
$100-87%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
18.5+640%
Codename
Tahiti
Coffee Lake GT2
Release
January 18 2014
May 24 2018
Ranking
#423
#640
Search FirePro 3D V7800 on AmazonSearch Intel UHD Graphics P630 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.