FirePro 3D V7800 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630
FirePro 3D V7800
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V7800 is positioned at rank 270 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 is on rank 263, so the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P630.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Intel UHD Graphics P630, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 26.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7800 and Intel UHD Graphics P630
FirePro 3D V7800
The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 reaches 1,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,867+1% | 1,848 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+656% | 0.4608 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+967% | 3 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V7800 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The FirePro 3D V7800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs Gen 9.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | Gen 9.5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.8 | 123.2+1712% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The FirePro 3D V7800 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) — the FirePro 3D V7800 offers 26.2% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $100-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.7+26% | 37.0 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | May 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #423 | #640 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V7800 and Intel UHD Graphics P630
