FirePro 3D V7800
VS
GeForce GTX 645

FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce GTX 645

FirePro 3D V7800

2014Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

2010Core: 607 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V7800 is positioned at rank #270 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
96%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
95%
#255
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6005%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
100%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
100%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
97%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
95%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
95%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
92%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
90%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
90%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 645 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 101.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+101.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7800 and GeForce GTX 645

AMD

FirePro 3D V7800

The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 645 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 645). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
G3D Mark Score
1,867
1,880
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+482%
352
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+307%
0.8554 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+191%
44
L1 Cache
512 KB
704 KB+38%
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V7800 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
DirectX
11.0
11.0
Vulkan
None
1.2
OpenGL
4.1
4.6+12%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
Encoder
UVD 2.3
NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder
UVD 2.3
PureVideo VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 31.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 254mm vs 147mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
TDP
274W
200W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
254mm
147mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
80-6%
Perf/Watt
6.8
9.4+38%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 101.3% better value. The FirePro 3D V7800 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V7800GeForce GTX 645
MSRP
$759
$150-80%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$20-50%
Performance per Dollar
46.7
94.0+101%
Codename
Tahiti
GF100
Release
January 18 2014
May 31 2010
Ranking
#423
#618