
FirePro 3D V7800 vs Radeon R7 450

FirePro 3D V7800
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V7800 is positioned at rank #270 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V7800.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $40), it costs 13% less, resulting in a 15.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7800 and Radeon R7 450

FirePro 3D V7800
The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.

Radeon R7 450
The Radeon R7 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,887 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the Radeon R7 450 reaches 1,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 450 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 512 (Radeon R7 450). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 450).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,867 | 1,887+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+325% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 450) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the Radeon R7 450's 55W — a 133.1% difference. The Radeon R7 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 250W (Radeon R7 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 55W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.8 | 34.3+404% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7 450 launched at $219 and now averages $35. The Radeon R7 450 costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 53.9 (Radeon R7 450) — the Radeon R7 450 offers 15.4% better value. The Radeon R7 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Radeon R7 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $219-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $35-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.7 | 53.9+15% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Cape Verde |
| Release | January 18 2014 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #423 | #667 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















