FirePro 3D V7800 vs Moore Threads MTT S70
FirePro 3D V7800
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V7800 is positioned at rank #270 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro 3D V7800 is significantly newer (2014 vs 0). The FirePro 3D V7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 71% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 247.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+247.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7800 and Moore Threads MTT S70
FirePro 3D V7800
The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the Moore Threads MTT S70 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,867 | 1,880 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | MUSA |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+229% |
| ROPs | 32 | 224+600% |
| TMUs | 128 | 224+75% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 3.5 MB+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V7800 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V7800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 3.5 MB+367% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 21.9% difference. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 220W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.8 | 8.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 and now averages $140. The FirePro 3D V7800 costs 71.4% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the FirePro 3D V7800 offers 248.5% better value.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $345-55% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-71% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.7+249% | 13.4 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Chunxiao |
| Release | January 18 2014 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #423 | #694 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V7800 and Moore Threads MTT S70
