
FirePro M5100

Moore Threads MTT S70
FirePro M5100 vs Moore Threads MTT S70 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M5100 vs Moore Threads MTT S70 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M5100 vs Moore Threads MTT S70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M5100
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 220W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 285mm, a 203mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
Moore Threads MTT S70
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅FirePro M5100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S70 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 150W.
- ❌247.6% longer card at 285mm vs 82mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M5100 vs Moore Threads MTT S70 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the Moore Threads MTT S70 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874 | 1,880 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | MUSA |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 3584+460% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+1056% |
| ROPs | 16 | 224+1300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 224+460% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3.5 MB+1300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 carries 512 MB. FirePro M5100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M5100 and 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S70. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M5100) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3.5 MB+1300% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 37.8% difference. The FirePro M5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-32% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 82mm | 285mm |
| Height | 70mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5+47% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M5100 came in at $0, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345. On MSRP, FirePro M5100 was 100+% cheaper ($345 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M5100) vs 5.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the FirePro M5100 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $345 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 5.4 |
| Codename | Venus | Chunxiao |
| Release | October 16 2013 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #701 | #694 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















