
FirePro M5100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 645
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 645 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M5100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 50.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+50.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5100 and GeForce GTX 645

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

GeForce GTX 645
The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the GeForce GTX 645 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 645 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 645). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874 | 1,880 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+82% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS+16% | 0.8554 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 44+10% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 704 KB+340% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB. The FirePro M5100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M5100) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 645's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro M5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 645). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 147mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 82mm | 147mm |
| Height | 70mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5+33% | 9.4 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M5100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 62.5 (FirePro M5100) vs 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 50.4% better value. The FirePro M5100 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 645 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.5 | 94.0+50% |
| Codename | Venus | GF100 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #701 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















