
FirePro M5100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

FirePro M5100
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M5100.
| Insight | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M5100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M5100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 230.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+230.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5100 and Radeon Pro WX 4130

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874 | 1,890 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 1.348 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1053 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M5100) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5 | 37.8+202% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M5100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The FirePro M5100 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 62.5 (FirePro M5100) vs 18.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the FirePro M5100 offers 230.7% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-70% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.5+231% | 18.9 |
| Codename | Venus | Baffin |
| Release | October 16 2013 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #701 | #697 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












